RandyK
04-03 02:06 PM
Good information
http://imminfo.com/resources/newsletter/2008-04Newsletter.pdf
http://imminfo.com/resources/newsletter/2008-04Newsletter.pdf
wallpaper but the quotes are set to
sreeraghu
07-16 12:25 PM
Recently I renewed my Advance Parole (AP), USCIS renewed it for 9 months only. Is it possible to check with USCIS to get a 1 year AP.
Thanks!
Thanks!
andyny73
12-08 08:37 PM
Hi,
I am going to get married next week.
I am a H-1b visa holder and I have applied for green card. I am waiting to get approval of I-140.
I want to file the H-4 visa for my wife and I have couple questions :
1) How difficult is to apply for H-4 ? Do I need a lawyer for that ?
2) How will my new status effect my green card application ? Do I need to apply again for I-140 ?
Thank you for your help.
Andrea
I am going to get married next week.
I am a H-1b visa holder and I have applied for green card. I am waiting to get approval of I-140.
I want to file the H-4 visa for my wife and I have couple questions :
1) How difficult is to apply for H-4 ? Do I need a lawyer for that ?
2) How will my new status effect my green card application ? Do I need to apply again for I-140 ?
Thank you for your help.
Andrea
2011 quote, quotes, truth
santa123
06-16 07:56 PM
Mine is MBA and the position is of a Business Analyst
more...
sac-r-ten
02-17 10:18 AM
As per my knowledge as long as H1B extension is applied and is in pending status you can stay/work. Is it a perm or regular case? I had my perm approved in 2 weeks. Last time my employers did a regular and it took approx 3 months.
If it gets rejected then you can use EAD, if you have one. Otherwise i think you have to leave the country in 30 days (or 15 days, i am not sure abt this).
If it gets rejected then you can use EAD, if you have one. Otherwise i think you have to leave the country in 30 days (or 15 days, i am not sure abt this).
a_yaja
03-09 08:04 PM
I see. And did you attached any documents with that statement?
Nothing other than the supporting docs:
1. expired I-94 from passport
2. 2 photos (with A# written in pencil on the back)
3. copy of I-485 receipt
4. sheet with answer to part 7 (including name and a# in header)
5. check made out to "Department of Homeland Security"
Nothing other than the supporting docs:
1. expired I-94 from passport
2. 2 photos (with A# written in pencil on the back)
3. copy of I-485 receipt
4. sheet with answer to part 7 (including name and a# in header)
5. check made out to "Department of Homeland Security"
more...
JAFO
04-15 11:06 PM
Well, I finally got a hold of an actual human on the main USCIS number. They confirmed only that the office is open on Fridays for appointments. That means I am hitting the road to Milwaukee.
Thanks for the help. I determined that the website has different info for ASC and what is called the Field Office. Unfortunately, it's not clear and led to my confusion. Hope it all works out. Thanks again. JAFO.
Thanks for the help. I determined that the website has different info for ASC and what is called the Field Office. Unfortunately, it's not clear and led to my confusion. Hope it all works out. Thanks again. JAFO.
2010 TAGS . quote . quotes . truth
rpat1968
11-05 02:38 PM
How long is it taking now a days to get AP approval. I am from TX and e-filed on 2nd Oct (ND 4th OCT 2010) and want to know when I can expect the approval.
my spouse AP was approved last friday also from NSC and we recd the document just yesterday.
my spouse AP was approved last friday also from NSC and we recd the document just yesterday.
more...
pravino
05-27 05:24 PM
Hi,
I am in the same state as you are. My H4 expires by sept4,2010 and my H1 starts from Oct1,2010. I have filed for H4 extension to avoid out of status.What are you upto now? Can you travel when H4 extension is filed? any reply?
I am in the same state as you are. My H4 expires by sept4,2010 and my H1 starts from Oct1,2010. I have filed for H4 extension to avoid out of status.What are you upto now? Can you travel when H4 extension is filed? any reply?
hair life, quote, quotes, truth
theMan
01-14 12:17 PM
No issues on both fronts as long as you have adhered to the terms and conditions while obtaining the Canadian Visa. I had similar circumstances in the recent past.
A factor to consider is the unpredictable time spent at the secondary inspection when returning. I am not sure how that will work when you drive across the border.
A factor to consider is the unpredictable time spent at the secondary inspection when returning. I am not sure how that will work when you drive across the border.
more...
sertasheep
09-03 10:27 AM
IV Members can access the recordings of the previous conference calls at the following URL : http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com/
To date, recordings from the following conference calls are available:
09/01/2006
08/11/2006
07/28/2006
You are encouraged to send in your questions, per the procedure outlined in the thread Free Legal Advice/Opinion from Immigration Lawyers (With Transcripts)
(http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1267/)
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
By participating in any conference calls or reviewing a transcript or recording of any conference calls, you agree that you have read and understand the following disclaimer: The information provided during these conference calls as well as any transcripts or recordings posted on this website or websites of participating law firms or attorneys is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or to all circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of any participating attorneys or in any way establish an attorney-client relationship with any participating attorneys. You should not rely solely upon information that you may receive during any conference calls, or any transcripts or recordings of conference calls. You should consult an attorney of your choosing to obtain advice for your particular situation. Laws and regulations are constantly changing. The information provided during any conference calls and their transcripts or recordings was pertinent at the time of the conference calls, but may become outdated. We are not responsible in any way for any outdated materials. IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS, LAW FIRMS, INDIVIDUALS, OR IMMIGRATION VOICE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH PARTICIPATION IN ANY CONFERENCE CALLS, THE USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ANY OTHER WEBSITE WHERE TRANSCRIPTS OR RECORDINGS MAY BE POSTED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE OUT OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE.
To date, recordings from the following conference calls are available:
09/01/2006
08/11/2006
07/28/2006
You are encouraged to send in your questions, per the procedure outlined in the thread Free Legal Advice/Opinion from Immigration Lawyers (With Transcripts)
(http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1267/)
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
By participating in any conference calls or reviewing a transcript or recording of any conference calls, you agree that you have read and understand the following disclaimer: The information provided during these conference calls as well as any transcripts or recordings posted on this website or websites of participating law firms or attorneys is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or to all circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of any participating attorneys or in any way establish an attorney-client relationship with any participating attorneys. You should not rely solely upon information that you may receive during any conference calls, or any transcripts or recordings of conference calls. You should consult an attorney of your choosing to obtain advice for your particular situation. Laws and regulations are constantly changing. The information provided during any conference calls and their transcripts or recordings was pertinent at the time of the conference calls, but may become outdated. We are not responsible in any way for any outdated materials. IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS, LAW FIRMS, INDIVIDUALS, OR IMMIGRATION VOICE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH PARTICIPATION IN ANY CONFERENCE CALLS, THE USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ANY OTHER WEBSITE WHERE TRANSCRIPTS OR RECORDINGS MAY BE POSTED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE OUT OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE.
hot Quotes displaying hidden truth
vkallank
09-21 09:06 PM
guyfrommsg,
i have filed in the form / submitted the application for joining the google GA group. please check.
i have filed in the form / submitted the application for joining the google GA group. please check.
more...
house “Truth is like the sun.
when
02-29 12:41 PM
Folks,
The online status shows a different date than the receipt date my lawyer is telling me. I am july filer......the lawyer telling me july date and online shows sept date.......
Is this normal?
Thank You
The online status shows a different date than the receipt date my lawyer is telling me. I am july filer......the lawyer telling me july date and online shows sept date.......
Is this normal?
Thank You
tattoo Best Truth quotes application
Blog Feeds
03-26 08:40 AM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
For the second time, a federal judge has declared a Farmers Branch ordinance banning illegal immigrants from renting in the city to be unconstitutional. Here are excerpts from a Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-FBsuit_25met.ART.Central.Edition1.4c77c2c.html) article reporting this decision:
U.S. District Judge Jane Boyle of Dallas ruled Wednesday that the ordinance was an attempt to enforce U.S. immigration laws – something the judge said only the federal government can do.
The judge also issued a permanent injunction to stop Farmers Branch from enforcing Ordinance 2952.
Mayor Tim O'Hare, the driving force behind the ordinances, said he wants to appeal.
"The American people are tired of judges legislating from the bench," he said. "This decision is not unexpected but welcomed, because it allows us to get closer to this ordinance becoming reality."
But O'Hare said the City Council would have to vote on whether to continue a fight that has cost the city nearly $3.2 million since September 2006. And the city may need to spend an additional $623,000 in legal fees in the year ahead, city finance director Charles Cox said Wednesday.
About one-quarter of the estimated 30,000 people who live in Farmers Branch were born outside the United States. About 47 percent of the city's population is Hispanic.
In the past four years, the city has proposed a series of ordinances that would make it illegal for landlords to rent to illegal immigrants. A version approved by the council in 2006 was repealed in early 2007 to make way for another ordinance.
That ordinance, No. 2903, was approved by two-thirds of voters in 2007 but later declared unconstitutional by U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay. The city abandoned an appeal of that ordinance in favor of Ordinance 2952. No. 2952 added all rental units, including houses, to the ban on renting to illegal immigrants.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/another-judge-rules-farmers-branch-rental-ban-is-unconstitutional.php)
For the second time, a federal judge has declared a Farmers Branch ordinance banning illegal immigrants from renting in the city to be unconstitutional. Here are excerpts from a Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-FBsuit_25met.ART.Central.Edition1.4c77c2c.html) article reporting this decision:
U.S. District Judge Jane Boyle of Dallas ruled Wednesday that the ordinance was an attempt to enforce U.S. immigration laws – something the judge said only the federal government can do.
The judge also issued a permanent injunction to stop Farmers Branch from enforcing Ordinance 2952.
Mayor Tim O'Hare, the driving force behind the ordinances, said he wants to appeal.
"The American people are tired of judges legislating from the bench," he said. "This decision is not unexpected but welcomed, because it allows us to get closer to this ordinance becoming reality."
But O'Hare said the City Council would have to vote on whether to continue a fight that has cost the city nearly $3.2 million since September 2006. And the city may need to spend an additional $623,000 in legal fees in the year ahead, city finance director Charles Cox said Wednesday.
About one-quarter of the estimated 30,000 people who live in Farmers Branch were born outside the United States. About 47 percent of the city's population is Hispanic.
In the past four years, the city has proposed a series of ordinances that would make it illegal for landlords to rent to illegal immigrants. A version approved by the council in 2006 was repealed in early 2007 to make way for another ordinance.
That ordinance, No. 2903, was approved by two-thirds of voters in 2007 but later declared unconstitutional by U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay. The city abandoned an appeal of that ordinance in favor of Ordinance 2952. No. 2952 added all rental units, including houses, to the ban on renting to illegal immigrants.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/another-judge-rules-farmers-branch-rental-ban-is-unconstitutional.php)
more...
pictures quotes middot; truth middot; true; 39
chintu25
12-13 03:18 PM
:)
dresses Quotes Truth Quotations
nozerd
05-02 09:38 AM
Check out this website. It has all the details you need
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/newcomer/res-oblig.html
if you click on the appropriate link it defines what a Canadian business should be.
Hope this helps.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/newcomer/res-oblig.html
if you click on the appropriate link it defines what a Canadian business should be.
Hope this helps.
more...
makeup Truth Quotes
priderock
08-02 04:57 PM
Similar case. My lawyer told me that we can't apply the second I140 under premium because the original labor is gone with the first I140. So, I could not wait for second I140 and went ahead and filed for 485 under EB3.
girlfriend lovely, quotes, sky, truth
saileshdude
06-02 05:45 PM
I'm curious if anyone has got multiple RFEs on their I-485 application. I had an EVL RFE last year and wonder about the chances they'll give that (or any other) RFEs again in future.
Any personal experiences?
By multiple RFE I don't mean many questions in 1 RFE letter. I mean USCIS sends you 1 RFE, receives reply and resumes the case and then at a later point in time sends another RFE on the same application.
No personal experience but based on recent visa bulletin and slow movement prediction going forward I would not be surprised if they send another EVL RFE, especially if your PD is more recent. This is because if and when your PD is approaching to be current, that could take 2, 3 4 or even 5 years. They may ask for EVL again to verify you still have a job offer after 5 years.
Any personal experiences?
By multiple RFE I don't mean many questions in 1 RFE letter. I mean USCIS sends you 1 RFE, receives reply and resumes the case and then at a later point in time sends another RFE on the same application.
No personal experience but based on recent visa bulletin and slow movement prediction going forward I would not be surprised if they send another EVL RFE, especially if your PD is more recent. This is because if and when your PD is approaching to be current, that could take 2, 3 4 or even 5 years. They may ask for EVL again to verify you still have a job offer after 5 years.
hairstyles truth quotes.gif
reddymjm
04-08 11:46 AM
As I said before the CAP will not reach for a month or two.
shruthi07
06-04 10:47 AM
.
i99
09-18 01:46 PM
Please see another attorney (not through your employer) ASAP. Have and individual consultation. I think the best you can do is to help yourself at this point. Hang in there. :(
No comments:
Post a Comment